Best stock to invest in – What The US Election Will Mean For The Global Solar Industry

Best stock to invest in

by Paula Mints

The endless and endlessly not amusing US presidential election is
thankfully wrapping up in November and there is a lot at stake for
solar – globally. This is because the market for solar components
and systems is global. Even the smallest installer buys imports.
Even the smallest component manufacturer has the potential to ship
product into any global market. A hiccup in one market (China, for
example) reverberates throughout the entire global market for solar
components and systems.

A hiccup in the US market for solar deployment would affect business
plans and forecasts for all participants and observers – globally.

Currently the US market for commercial installations is stable. The
US market for residential installations is currently less stable.
Manufacturers, developers, scientists, engineers, teach-ers,
insurance firms, law firms, consultants and others from around the
world look to do business in the relatively stable climate for solar
deployment in the US.

The following presents US solar market growth in the aggregate from
2006 through 2016.

 Aggregate US Solar PV Market Growth, 2006-2016

In this US presidential election, one presidential candidate has
tweeted that climate change is a hoax “invented by the Chinese to
make U.S. manufacturers noncompetitive.”

The other presidential candidate will make the climate a key part of
her agenda and will follow through on many of President Obama’s
mandates concerning it.

Like it or not, the 2016 presidential election is crucial to solar –
and wind and other renewable electricity generating technologies –
momentum in the US and elsewhere. Here are a few of the reasons why:

The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court should have nine justices, thus ensuring no tie
decisions. Currently there are eight justices on the US Supreme
Court, which opens the possibility of a tie instead of a majority
decision. A tie is a stalemate that allows decisions rendered by
lower courts to stand. The Clean Power Plan is currently being
legislated in at least 24 states. The new president will appoint (or
attempt to appoint) at least one justice, maybe two, to the court.
As justices serve for life or until retirement the direction of the
US will be affected for decades by whatever happens with the US
Supreme Court. Should the Republicans lose control of the House or
senate, or, should numbers tighten in the House, the current
historic refusal to give President Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland a
hearing would pass into painful US history, the stalemate would be
broken and congress would (potentially) finally do its job. This
means that the current congressional election is almost as important
as the presidential election in that both affect the future of the
Supreme Court.

The Clean Power Plan

Secretary Clinton has said that she will uphold the CPP. Mr. Trump
has promised to repeal it. Despite filing lawsuits states are making
plans to install and integrate renewables. Even if the CPP is
repealed some of these plans will go forward (in California for
example) though some will be scaled back and many will be scrapped.

Florida Constitutional Amendment

This is specific to Florida and so this one is on the voters. Should
this constitutional amend-ment succeed look for something similar to
pop up on ballots in other states. Deceptive language used for a
constitutional amendment that is on the ballot in Florida backed by
its biggest utilities claims to promote solar when it would actually
allow utilities to raise fees on solar customers. If approved it
would take effect immediately and an already underperforming market
would be unlikely to become a highly performing one.

The DoE

The president appoints the Secretary of Energy. The Secretary of
Energy is the head of the DoE and determines its direction. A
climate change denier as head of the DoE would be disastrous for the
solar budget and the budget for renewable energy technologies
develop-ment and deployment.


A budget squeeze at the DoE would affect NREL’s funding and perhaps
defund it altogether.


The ITC was a bipartisan agreement – not all conservatives and
republicans are climate change deniers. It would take an act of
congress to overturn the ITC and this is unlikely.

The Environmental Protection Agency, EPA

Mr. Trump would like to eliminate the EPA (and other consumer and
climate protections). Secretary Clinton holds Obama’s view on the
EPA’s direction.

Paris Climate Change Agreement

The Paris Climate Change Agreement commits countries to take action
to slow the rise in global temperatures and to offer voluntary plans
in this regard. The Paris Agreement relies on nations to behave in
their own and the climate’s best interest and to act as though the
agreement were binding – which it is not. Secretary Clinton will not
only uphold the Paris Climate Agreement, she will act on it. Mr.
Trump has loudly and proudly said that he will pull out of the

The US Oil, Gas and Coal Industries

A big winner if Trump is elected but likely to not suffer terribly
under a Clinton administration.

Paula Mints is founder of SPV Market Research, a
classic solar market research practice focused on gathering data
through primary research and providing analyses of the global
solar industry.  You can find her on T
witter @PaulaMints1
and read
her blog here.

This article was originally published in the October31st issue
of  SolarFlare,
a bimonthly executive report on the solar industry, and is
republished with permission.

– Best stock to invest in

Start trading now on the best platform on the market.

Source link